Grammar & punctuation rules reference

This is the lookup sheet for every grammar and punctuation rule tested on the SAT Reading & Writing section and the ACT English section. The two tests draw from the same finite set of rules — a comma splice is wrong on both — so the rules below apply to both unless marked ACT only. Each rule has one correct (✓) and one incorrect (✗) example. Rules tagged seen on real tests are ones whose answer pattern was confirmed against official released SAT/ACT items.

SAT & ACT Prerequisite · Writing · Reference

Contents

  1. Periods & semicolons
  2. Colons & dashes
  3. Comma + FANBOYS
  4. Commas & dependent clauses
  5. Transitions
  6. Nonessential information
  7. Commas with names & titles
  8. Comma misuses
  9. Apostrophes
  10. Pronouns: who / which / whom
  11. Subject-verb agreement
  12. Verb tense & form
  13. Parallel structure & word pairs
  14. Dangling modifiers
  15. Faulty comparisons
  16. Question marks
  17. Shorter is better (ACT)
  18. Adjectives vs. adverbs (ACT)
  19. Pronoun case (ACT)
  20. Diction & idioms (ACT)
The master principle for punctuation

Most punctuation questions reduce to one question: is each side of the punctuation a complete sentence (independent clause) or not? A period, semicolon, and comma + FANBOYS are all interchangeable and all join two complete sentences. A comma alone cannot. A colon or dash introduces something but needs a complete sentence in front of it.

Punctuation

1

Periods & semicolons

seen on real tests

A period and a semicolon are grammatically identical on both tests — both join two complete sentences. Because they're identical, the test will never make you choose between them. A semicolon also goes before a conjunctive adverb (however, therefore, moreover) starting a new clause.

The city is old, it has modern parts. — comma splice.
The city is old. It has modern parts. / The city is old; it has modern parts.
The city is old; however, it has modern parts.

Boundary trap: read all the way to the period — one sentence can run on past where you'd expect, hiding a second complete sentence that needs stronger punctuation.

2

Colons & dashes

seen on real tests

A colon or a single dash introduces a list or explanation, and must follow a complete sentence. Colons and dashes are interchangeable for this, so you won't choose between them. On the digital SAT, the colon is often the correct answer when two sentences must be joined and no period/semicolon option appears.

London is home to a variety of: museums, castles, and shops. — "a variety of" isn't a sentence.
London has three main attractions: museums, castles, and shops.
The wall lost its purpose — the empire now extended past it.
3

Comma + FANBOYS

A comma plus a coordinating conjunction (For, And, Nor, But, Or, Yet, So) joins two complete sentences — equivalent to a period. But a comma + FANBOYS is wrong when the second part isn't a complete sentence (no new subject).

The city is old, but parts of it are modern. — two complete sentences.
The city is old, but has modern parts. — "has modern parts" has no subject.
The city is old but has modern parts. — no comma.

Shortcut: comma + and/but = period. Plug in a period; if you get a fragment, drop the comma.

4

Commas & dependent clauses

seen on real tests

A dependent clause starts with a subordinator (although, because, when, while, since, if, after) and can't stand alone. When it comes first, follow it with a comma; when it comes second, usually no comma. Never a semicolon between a dependent and independent clause.

Because the city is old, it has buildings from many eras.
The city has buildings from many eras because it is old.
Because the city is old; it has many eras. — semicolon can't join these.

Meaning & modifiers

5

Transitions

seen on real tests

Transition questions are about meaning, not grammar — all choices are grammatically fine, and you pick the one with the right logic. Three families: continuers (in addition, moreover, for example, then), cause-effect (therefore, thus, consequently), contradictors (however, nevertheless, in contrast).

The Wall was built for protection. However, China had no powerful enemies then. — opposing ideas → contradictor.

Method: cover the transition, state the relationship between the two sentences (same / opposite / cause-effect) in your own words, then match. If two choices mean the same thing, both are wrong. ACT only If an OMIT/DELETE option exists, check it first — it's often correct.

6

Nonessential information

seen on real tests

Removable extra information is set off by a matched pair: two commas, two dashes, or two parentheses. Never mix the pair and never drop one half. If the phrase can be lifted out and the sentence still works, it's nonessential.

Marie Curie, a physicist, won two Nobels. / Marie Curie — a physicist — won…
Marie Curie, a physicist — won two Nobels. — comma in, dash out.

Single interrupting words like however take two commas (never two dashes): It does, however, have modern parts.

7

Commas with names & titles

seen on real tests

Only two correct options: no commas (the name is essential) or two commas (nonessential). A single comma before a name in mid-sentence is always wrong. Test by removing the name.

…led by engineering professor Vikram Iyer have created… — name essential, no commas.
…led by a professor, Vikram Iyer, have created… — name nonessential, two commas.
8

Comma misuses

seen on real tests

Commas should not appear: between a subject and its verb (even a long subject); before/after a preposition; between two items joined by and; or around the word that.

The oldest bridge in London, is Richmond Bridge. — splits subject from verb.
The oldest bridge in London is Richmond Bridge.
London is a city, that has old buildings. — no comma with that.

On a real SAT item, the correct answer was simply "no punctuation," because every other choice inserted a needless mark between a long subject and its verb. Take "no punctuation" choices seriously.

Words & agreement

9

Apostrophes: plural vs. possessive

seen on real tests

Nouns: apostrophe = possessive (singular cell's, plural cells'); no apostrophe = plain plural. Pronouns are the opposite: possessive pronouns take no apostrophe.

  • its = possessive; it's = "it is"; its' doesn't exist.
  • their = possessive; they're = "they are"; there = place.
  • whose = possessive; who's = "who is."
London is known for its many attractions.
London is known for it's many attractions. — "it is many"? No.

Tip: when it's/its is tested, its is the answer more often, because students over-associate apostrophes with possession. Confirmed on a real ACT item (its usage).

10

Pronouns: who / which / whom

seen on real tests

Who(m) for people, which for things, that for either. Who = subject; whom = object (after a preposition, or where "him/them" would fit). A pronoun must also agree in number with the noun it replaces.

…the brave women who contributed to the effort. — people, subject.
…the brave women which contributed…which isn't for people.
…a painter to whom many owe inspiration. — after a preposition.
11

Subject-verb agreement

seen on real tests

Match the verb to its true subject in number. The test buries the subject behind prepositional phrases or nonessential clauses — strip those out. Two singular subjects joined by and are plural; each and every are singular.

Illegal logging in the forests have caused damage. — subject is "logging."
Illegal logging in the forests has caused damage.
Each of the chiefdoms was ruled by a cacique. — "each" is singular.
12

Verb tense & form

seen on real tests

Keep tense consistent with the surrounding sentences. A main clause needs a finite verb (one that shows tense, like claim/claimed) — a participle (claiming, having claimed, to claim) can't be the main verb. Use have/has + verb with for/since; use had + verb with by the time.

Some historians claiming this is true. — no finite verb; fragment.
Some historians claim this is true.
The myths have predominated since the 1900s. — for/since → present perfect.

Watch: "tense" questions are often agreement questions in disguise — if the choices differ in both tense and number, the number usually decides it. Complex tenses (would have done) are almost always wrong.

13

Parallel structure & word pairs

seen on real tests

Items in a list or comparison must share the same form. Fixed word pairs must stay paired and parallel: neither…nor, not only…but also, as…as, more/less…than.

She likes running, to swim, and biking.
She likes running, swimming, and biking.
It can run either on tracks and on the street.either…and is broken.
It can run either on tracks or on the street.
14

Dangling modifiers

seen on real tests

When a sentence opens with a descriptive phrase + comma, the noun right after the comma must be the thing that phrase describes. Otherwise it dangles.

Born in 1907, self-portraits were what Frida Kahlo was known for. — self-portraits weren't born.
Born in 1907, Frida Kahlo was known for her self-portraits.

Confirmed on a real SAT item: the answer placed the modified noun immediately after a "Based on events…" opening; every distractor created a dangler.

15

Faulty comparisons

Compare like with like — things to things, people to people. The phrases that of (singular) and those of (plural), or a possessive, fix mismatched comparisons.

The work of Marshall is as well-known as Frank Lloyd Wright. — work vs. person.
…as well-known as that of Frank Lloyd Wright. / …as Frank Lloyd Wright's.

ACT only Use than (not then) for comparisons. Quantity words: number/many/fewer for countable plurals, amount/much/less for singulars.

16

Question marks

Rarely tested. Use a question mark only for a direct question. An indirect question embedded in a statement takes a period.

One question remains: how much do babies understand? — direct.
The studies test how much babies understand. — indirect, period.

ACT only  Rules specific to the ACT English section

These appear on the ACT but not the digital SAT. The SAT tests rhetoric differently (under Expression of Ideas), so treat this block as ACT-specific.

17

Shorter is better

seen on real tests

When several choices are grammatically correct and say the same thing, the shortest one is almost always right. The ACT penalizes wordiness and redundancy.

an enormous undertaking that occurred on a very large scale
an enormous undertaking — "enormous" already means large-scale.

You can often pre-pick the shortest choice on sight, then verify it isn't missing needed information.

18

Adjectives vs. adverbs

Adjectives modify nouns; adverbs (usually -ly) modify verbs. Don't double up comparatives/superlatives (more + -er or most + -est is wrong).

Monkeys appear frequent in her paintings. — modifies a verb → need adverb.
Monkeys appear frequently in her paintings.
a more stronger influence
a stronger influence
19

Pronoun case

Tested in compounds (name + pronoun or two pronouns). Cross out the other element and judge by ear. Between always takes object pronouns (me, him, them).

My mother and me attended. — "me attended"? No.
My mother and I attended. — "I attended."
20

Diction & idioms

seen on real tests

Pick the word that fits meaning and the idiomatic preposition; these go by ear. Two reliable rules: have, never of (could have, not could of), and register should be neither too formal nor too casual.

effective with keeping people in
effective at keeping people in — idiomatic preposition.
a remarkable variety — not "a whole bunch" (too casual) or "a sublime plethora" (too formal).
Source & validation

The rule taxonomy follows the standard SAT/ACT grammar canon, with rule definitions checked against College Board's official "What's on the SAT" specifications and the Standard English Conventions domain. Rules tagged seen on real tests have answer patterns confirmed against official released items — College Board's Digital SAT Sample Questions and two complete released ACT English sections. Faulty comparisons and question marks rest on the standard rule canon rather than a confirmed item in the sample. Example sentences are illustrative teaching items, not reproduced test content.

Shu's Tutoring Prerequisites · Grammar & punctuation rules